purity of selfishness?
It seems that I am a die hard and very predictable advocate of opposing view points. I’ve been called a "devils advocate" more than once. I hope this is not the case, that I am guided by something concrete, that I am only trying to better understand, and that it is not out of dissension that I (so often) question.
I’ve recently been reading a book on romantic love, by a well respected author. In this book, he describes romantic love as “that quality that moves a person to act for the benefit of another without respect to the advantage that it might bring to the one who expresses it…” There is (of course) a plethora of context surrounding this statement. Don’t get me wrong, I understand the author’s thoughts and intentions. Nevertheless, I think he says it wrong and I’m not so charitable as to let him get away with it. It’s my guess that the definition is very important to success or failure in relationships.
In my understanding, his definition is regularly (if not completely) inaccurate. I highly doubt (and hope it is not the case) that any two people are attracted to each other purely for the benefit of the other; without respect for the advantages to one’s self. When you loose the benefit you also loose the incentive to act.
Dating is, without question, the most common vehicle for modern relationships. I perceive dating to be a calculated chance for two people to win each other’s hearts. Almost anyone would accept this definition. So then, why would one individual want to win the heart of another? Hopefully it’s no shock, but humans don’t usually pursue romance simply for the benefit of another. This would be charity. Because of the other, yes….but not for the other. If a heart is won, it should always be done out of selfish intent. There is a “for him/her” but it is derived from the “for me.” Because a lover’s happiness is directly involved, they naturally want nothing less than the best for the object of their love.
Yes, love is a “sacrificial gift.” Further, it is a gift with many strings attached…and every string is an increase in its value. What about “the way of a man with a maiden?” Why do our knees grow week, why do we lose our minds, why do we court, and why do we love? I suppose these things could be defined as a sort of purity of selfishness.
The fact that a lover’s actions are performed out of selfishness is why they should be valued. This sort of selfishness is the clearest symbol of ones love, respect, and value for another. Love is a currency and if invested wisely it will reap endless benefits.
*this perspective is only possible within a Christian worldview*







